Fined For Leaving Rubber Bands On Public Road

The Straits Times' article entitled Man Fined $300 For Shooting 2 Rubber Bands Onto Public Road (27 May 2019) is self-explanatory.

The newspaper further obtained an opinion from Professor Paulin Tay Straughan, Dean of Students and Professor of Sociology (Practice) at Singapore Management University. She said "As long as it was intentional and he had no intention of picking it up, since he left it there, it is littering. If he littered, then it is against the law."

It's making Singapore ― in particular, the Singapore government and its public servants and its contracted agents ― a lauging stock.

Strong Ruling Party With Clear Majority

In The Straits Times' 27 May 2019  article entitled Singapore must have strong ruling party with clear majority: Goh Chok Tong Mr Goh hoped that the party in charge must have a clear majority of seats, meaning 75 to 80 per cent of the seats in Parliament.

Would he have similarly hoped if his People's Action Party was the opposition party?

The journalist from Lianhe Zaobao apparently failed, or seemed to have failed, to ask him this very important question.


Mr Goh also said that group representation constituencies ("GRCs") were a "stabiliser".

GRCs force candidates standing for parliamentary election into groups of three, four, five or even six. It is a uniquely Singapore concept conceived by PAP. Although its stated objective is to ensure that minority races are represented in parliament (one candidate in each GRC must be from a minority i.e., non-ethnic-Chinese race), it makes it difficult, though not impossible, for opposition parties to win GRCs.

Chua Mui Hoong on POFMA

Chua Mui Hoong, The Straits Times' opinion editor, wrote an article on 26 May 2019 entitled Pofma: Is Singapore's fake news law too powerful or not enough?

Pofma or POFMA is the recently legislated Prevention from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act.

Many readers might have anticipated where Ms Chua's article was headed, including her opinion that she was "surprised it did not go further" and that it "could have been a much stronger law".

Ms Chua also revealed that "some government leaders asked [her] what [she] thought of Pofma".

Why would some government leaders ask Ms Chua about POFMA?

Why would any government leaders ask Ms Chua about POFMA?